lunedì 31 luglio 2017

Estimated Chinese Gold Reserves Surpass 20,000t

My best estimate as of June 2017 with respect to total above ground gold reserves within the Chinese domestic market is 20,193 tonnes. The majority of these reserves are held by the citizenry, an estimated 16,193 tonnes; the residual 4,000 tonnes, which is a speculative yet conservative estimate, is held by the Chinese central bank the People’s Bank of China.
I’m aware I’ve been absent from writing about the Chinese gold market for a long time, so for some of you it can be burdensome to pick up where we left a few months ago. It is not feasible for me to explain the entire structure of the Chinese gold market again; my suggestion would be to follow the links provided in the text for more background info. Most knowledge is covered in previous BullionStar posts, Mechanics Of The Chinese Domestic Gold MarketChinese Cross-Border Gold Trade RulesWorkings Of The Shanghai International Gold Exchange
To substantiate my estimates on above ground gold reserves in China mainland, we’ll first discuss private gold accumulation in China through the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE), after which we’ll address official purchases by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and its proxies that operate in the international over-the-counter market.

Chinese Private Gold Accumulation

A few days ago, you could read on the BullionStar Gold Market Charts page that withdrawals from the vaults of SGE in June accounted for 156 tonnes. Year to date SGE withdrawals have reached 984 tonnes, which is 16 % shy of the record year 2015 when 1178 tonnes were withdrawn by this time. Since 2013 gold demand in China has remained extremely elevated – don’t let the World Gold Council tell you anything different – which exposes spectacular years of physical gold accumulation by the Chinese.
Monthly Gold Withdrawn From Shanghai Gold Exchange Vaults vs Gold Price In Renminbi
Exhibit 1.
The amount of SGE withdrawals provides a fairly good proxy for Chinese wholesale gold demand, although not all gold passing through the SGE adds to above ground reserves. In China, most scrap supply and disinvestment flows through the Shanghai bourse as well, next to mine output and imports. Needless to say, recycling gold within China doesn’t change the volume of above ground reserves. So, simply using SGE withdrawals won’t fly for calculating above ground reserves. What we’re interested in are net imports and mine production in the Chinese domestic gold market.
Although gold exports from the Chinese domestic market are prohibitedexports from the Shanghai Free Trade Zone (SFTZ) where the Shanghai International Gold Exchange (SGEI) is located, are permitted. Before calculating Chinese net imports, let’s have a brief look at exports from the SFTZ – which reflects to what extent the SGEI is developing as a physical gold hub in Asia. As far as I can see, China’s gold bullion export from the SFTZ is still negligible. From the United Nations’ international merchandise trade statistics service COMTRADE, it shows the only countries that have imported tiny amounts from China in 2017 are the UK and India. But the amounts are so small, they carry little importance for our analysis.
There is one region that is importing significant amounts of gold from China, which is Hong Kong, though, this likely isn’t exported from the SFTZ but from the Shenzhen Free Trade Zone. The vast majority of China’s jewellery manufacturers are in Shenzhen, and for quite some years gold jewellery, ornaments, industrial and semi-manufactured parts are being exported from this Chinese fabrication base to Hong Kong. These events haven’t got anything to do with the SGEI in my opinion. Thereby, Hong Kong exports far more gold to China than vice versa.
For computing net gold export from Hong Kong to China we’ll subtract “imports into Hong Kong from China” from “exports and re-exports from Hong Kong to China” (as you know China doesn’t disclose gold trade statistics itself). Imports into Hong Kong accounted for 23 tonnes, while exports and re-exports to China accounted for 333 tonnes. Accordingly, China net imported 311 tonnes from Hong Kong in the first five months of 2017.
Hong Kong - China gold trade monthly ccc
Exhibit 2. In 2016 rumours circulated Hong Kong’s elevated gold exports relative to gold re-exports possibly hinted at fallacious trade data. This year the numbers show no sign of such activities.
If we apply the same math to Switzerland’s customs data, it shows China net imported 172 tonnes from the Swiss in the first six months of this year.
Most definitely Australia has exported gold bullion directly to China in 2017 as well, but the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has changed its methodology regarding this data somewhere in 2016 and is reluctant to share the details with me. Using my old way to compute Australia’s export directly to China results in 23 tonnes (this number is provisional and will be amended).
The UK, a large gold exporter directly to China in 2014 and 2015, hasn’t shipped any gold directly to China year to date, according to Eurostat.
Largest Gold Exporters to China
Exhibit 3. Annualised Chinese gold import for 2017 stands at 1,159 tonnes.
What’s remarkable is that Chinese true gold demand is far greater than what the World Gold Council (WGC) and GFMS are reporting as “Chinese consumer gold demand”. This is due to incomplete metrics applied by the WGC and GFMS. The immense tonnages imported by China have been waived in previous years, by the aforementioned Western consultancy firms, with dishonest arguments. (If you like to study the details regarding gold demand metrics read this.) In reality, thousands of tonnes are being imported into China and this metal is not coming back in the foreseeable future; causing a bull run on steroids if institutional interest for gold rebounds in the West. Ascending above ground reserves within China imply declining above ground reserves in the rest of the world. And the more scarce the metal in the West, the higher price when demand revives. I’ve described this phenomenon in my previous post How The West Has Been Selling Gold Into A Black Hole. In a forthcoming posts I will add more texture to my analysis.
black-hole-3
Domestic mine production in China is not allowed to be exported, effectively all output can be added to above ground reserves. The China Gold Association (CGA) wrote on April 28, 2017, that Chinese domestic mine output in the first quarter accounted for 101 tonnes. Lacking the data for the second quarter, makes me estimate mine production from January until June by doubling 101, which is 202 tonnes. By the way, the CGA added:
Gold is a special product with the dual attribute of general commodity and currency. It is the cornerstone of important global strategic assets and the national financial reserve system. It plays an irreplaceable role in safeguarding national financial stability and economic security.
Based on data publicly available, in the first six months of 2017 China net imported at least 506 tonnes into the domestic market and mined 202 tonnes. An addition of 707 tonnes to Chinese private gold reserves.

Chinese Official Gold Purchases

I can be short on PBOC gold purchases: the Chinese central bank does not buy any gold through the SGE – its increments must be treated in addition to all visible flows – and it buys in secret not to disturb the global market. I’ve shared my analysis regarding the PBOC buying gold through proxies in the international over-the-counter (OTC) market for several years on these pages. Although, my reasoning has been confirmed countless times, it’s worth noting it was affirmed once more not long ago.
Early 2017 world renowned gold analyst Jim Rickards was in a meeting with the three heads of the precious metals trading desks of largest Chinese bullion banks. These gold dealers told Rickards that indeed the PBOC does not buy any gold through the SGE. Rickards stated in the Gold Chronicles podcast published January 17, 2017 (at 25:00) [brackets added by Koos Jansen]:
What I [J. Rickards] don’t know is about the Shanghai Gold Exchange sales, they’re pretty transparent, how much of that is private and how much of that is the government [PBOC]. And I was sort of guessing 50/50, 70/30, whatever. What they told me, and these guys are the dealers [the three heads of the precious metals trading desks], it’s 100 % private. Meaning, the government operates through completely separate channels. The government does not operate through the Shanghai Gold Exchange. … None of what’s going on on the Shanghai Gold Exchange is going to the People’s Bank Of China.
In fact, the PBOC uses Chinese banks as proxies to buy gold in countries like the UK, Switzerland and South-Africa after which the metal is transhipped to Beijing. Note, monetary gold shipments do not show up in customs reports of any country.
I haven’t come across any clues in the past months that have changed my estimate on the PBOC’s true official gold reserves. My best substantiated guess still is 4,000 tonnes (in contrast, the PBOC publicly discloses it holds about 1,840 tonnes). For more information on how and when the PBOC stacked up to 4,000 tonnes, continue reading at the BullionStar Gold University by clicking here.

Estimated Total Gold Reserves China 20,000 Tonnes

Let us put the pieces of the puzzle together. We know the PBOC doesn’t buy gold though the SGE, but prior to 2007 the Chinese gold market wasn’t fully liberalized and back then the PBOC was primary dealer in the domestic market. Any PBOC purchases prior to 2007 could have been from Chinese gold mines. What else do we know? China is said to be a gold importer since the 1990s, suggesting domestically mined gold was not exported after, say, 1994. In the next screen shot from the China Gold Market Report 2010 we can read “China has been a gold importer since the 1990s”.
Screen Shot 2015-05-17 at 11.48.53 PM
Exhibit 4. Courtesy China Gold Market Report 2010
For the sake of simplicity, we’ll calculate from 1994 onwards. Precious Metals Insights (PMI) has estimated that 2,500 tonnes of gold jewellery were held by the Chinese population in 1994. Furthermore, I have data on Chinese non-monetary gold import starting in 2001 – which started slowly but ramped up in 2010 (exhibit 2).
In 1994 PBOC official reserves accounted for 394 tonnes and Chinese domestic mine output accounted for 90 tonnes. So, our starting point in 1994 is:
2,500 (jewellery base) + 394 (official reserves) + 90 (mining) = 2,984 tonnes
From here, we can aggregate domestic mine output and net imports for every succeeding year. As stated above, my assumption is that the PBOC sourced its official gold from domestic mines prior to 2007, but shifted these acquisitions to the international market after 2007. The official gold increments in 2001 (105 tonnes) and 2003 (100 tonnes) I’ve subtracted from “aggregate domestic mine output”, the increments in 2009 (454 tonnes) and onwards I did not subtract from “aggregate domestic mine output”.
The previous calculation has resulted in the following chart:
Estimated Total Chinese Gold Reserves June 2017
Exhibit 5. Aggregate net import reflects non-monetary gold.
In the chart the green, blue and grey bars represent private gold reserves, and summed up account for an estimated 16,193 tonnes at the time of writing. The red bars reflect the PBOC’s official gold reserves – I would like to stress this number is speculative – and currently account for 4,000 tonnes. My best estimate as of June 2017 for total above ground gold reserves within the Chinese domestic market is 20,193 tonnes.
Fonte: qui

venerdì 28 luglio 2017

Washington. Altro scandalo in casa democratica. Deborah Wasserman Schultz.

Mafia 011

Mrs Deborah Wasserman Schultz è un pezzo grosso del partito democratico americano, essendo anche stata presidente del Democratic National Committee, massimo organo direzionale del partito.

«On July 24, 2016, Wasserman Schultz announced her resignation from her position after Wikileaks released a collection of hacked emails indicating that Wasserman Schultz and other members of the DNC staff showed bias against the presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign».

*

«She was subsequently appointed honorary chair of the Clinton campaign’s “50 state program”»

«Ronna Romney McDaniel, the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), is calling on former Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) to testify before Congress on her now-arrested, just-fired IT staffer.

McDaniel made the explosive demand in an exclusive interview with Breitbart News via phone on Wednesday afternoon, after news broke Tuesday night that Wasserman Schultz’s IT staffer for more than a decade was caught trying to flee the country by federal law enforcement agents after wiring hundreds of thousands of dollars to Pakistan.

“I think Congress needs to open an investigation into what this staffer had access to, to figure out what information he had on the hard drives he took a hammer to, why he was fleeing the country,” McDaniel told Breitbart News. “There are just so many questions with this individual and his family members who received over $4 million of taxpayer money between 2005 and 2009. We need to get to the bottom of it. It’s very sad that the mainstream media is not talking about this at all. It shows the bias.”

McDaniel is worried that Awan may have had access to information that not only put America’s national security at risk but may also be relevant» [Fonte]

*

Questo è il suo profilo più esteso di Mrs Deborah Wasserman Schultz.

«Deborah Wasserman Schultz (born September 27, 1966) is an American politician. She is the U.S. Representative for Florida’s 23rd congressional district. She is a member of the Democratic Party and was a former chairperson for the Democratic National Committee.

Wasserman Schultz previously served in the Florida House of Representatives and the Florida Senate, and was a national campaign co-chair for Hillary Clinton’s unsuccessful 2008 run for president. She is the first Jewish congresswoman elected from Florida. Her district covers parts of Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, including Fort Lauderdale and Miami Beach.

Wasserman Schultz was elected chairperson of the Democratic National Committee in May 2011, replacing Virginia Senator Tim Kaine. On July 24, 2016, Wasserman Schultz announced her resignation from her position after Wikileaks released a collection of hacked emails indicating that Wasserman Schultz and other members of the DNC staff showed bias against the presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Her resignation was finalized on July 28 following the 2016 Democratic National Convention. She was subsequently appointed honorary chair of the Clinton campaign’s “50 state program”» [Fonte]

*

Il responsabile all’informatica di un simile personaggio politico aveva accesso diretto a tutte le informazioni riservate a livello governativo.

Mrs Wasserman Schultz ha anche minacciato gli inquirenti di “conseguenze”.

«A House IT staffer at the center of a congressional computer equipment scandal has been arrested by federal officials and charged with bank fraud»

*

«Law enforcement authorities for months have been looking into how Awan may have double-billed the House for equipment like computers, iPads, monitors, keyboards and routers. Several relatives of Awan worked for House Democrats and were fired months ago»

*

«Awan, however, was kept on staff by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., even though he was no longer allowed access to the House server network»

*

«Authorities also have looked into IT workers putting sensitive House information on the “cloud” and potentially exposing it to outside sources»

*

«Meanwhile, the counsel for Wasserman Schultz, the former Democratic National Committee chairwoman, recently began negotiating with Capitol Police for access to her laptop in the case. Until this point, she had resisted USCP efforts to look at her computer – even suggesting “consequences” for the agency if the computer was not promptly returned»

* * *

«Federal authorities said Awan allegedly tried to get a $165,000 home equity loan through the Congressional Federal Credit Union for a rental property, which violates the credit union’s policy because it is not the owner’s primary residence»

*

«The $165,000 was then transferred to two people in Faisalabad, Pakistan»

*

«Federal agents said they didn’t believe Awan had any intention of returning to the U.S.»

*

«Awan’s attorney, Chris Gowen, said his client is the victim of a right-wing media conspiracy»

* * * * * * * *

Al momento non è dato sapere quali e quanti segreti di stato siano stati a conoscenza di Mr Awan. Di solito, le persone che hanno triboli economici non sono i migliori depositari di segreti, specie poi di quelli sensibili.

Nulla esclude anche da pensare che l’Fbi già da tempo sospettasse la persona e gli passasse informazioni fasulle.

Prendiamo però atto della gravità del caso e delle risposte date da Mrs Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Un’unica considerazione finale.

Cosa mai sarebbe successo se Mr Awan avesse lavorato per il partito repubblicano?


Fox News. 2017-07-26. Feds arrest IT staffer for Wasserman Schultz trying to leave country

A House IT staffer at the center of a congressional computer equipment scandal has been arrested by federal officials and charged with bank fraud, Fox News has learned.

Fox News is told officers and agents from the U.S. Capitol Police, the FBI and Customs and Border Protection were involved in the arrest of Imran Awan at Dulles International Airport. 

Awan, 37, of Virginia, pleaded not guilty Tuesday to one count of bank fraud during his arraignment in federal court in Washington, D.C. He was released but will have to wear a GPS monitor and abide by a curfew. 

Awan also was ordered to turn over all his passports. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Aug. 21. 

Law enforcement authorities for months have been looking into how Awan may have double-billed the House for equipment like computers, iPads, monitors, keyboards and routers. Several relatives of Awan worked for House Democrats and were fired months ago. Awan, however, was kept on staff by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., even though he was no longer allowed access to the House server network.

Wasserman Schultz, though, has now fired Awan. Spokesman David Damron said Tuesday in a statement:

“Mr. Awan previously served as a part-time employee but his services have been terminated. No charges, evidence or findings from the investigation have been formally shared with our office, so we cannot comment on them.”

Authorities also have looked into IT workers putting sensitive House information on the “cloud” and potentially exposing it to outside sources.

Fox News is told that federal officials arrested Awan at Dulles airport in suburban Virginia as he was “trying to leave the country.” 

The criminal complaint and affidavit said he had bought a ticket to fly Monday to Doha, Qatar, and then Lahore, Pakistan, with a return flight booked for early January. The affidavit specifically alleged he engaged in a scheme to defraud a Congressional Federal Credit Union. It did not appear to go in depth into the other matters investigators have been looking into. 

Meanwhile, the counsel for Wasserman Schultz, the former Democratic National Committee chairwoman, recently began negotiating with Capitol Police for access to her laptop in the case. Until this point, she had resisted USCP efforts to look at her computer – even suggesting “consequences” for the agency if the computer was not promptly returned.

Fox News first reported last week that arrests were coming in the case.

Awan and his relatives worked for House Democrats for more than a decade, earning hundreds of thousands of dollars. But Awan declared bankruptcy in 2012.

Awan is of Pakistani descent, and Democratic sources have argued the family’s ethnicity is a factor in the attention they’re receiving. 


Breitbart. 2017-07-26. Aide for Rep. Wasserman Schultz arrested while trying to leave country

An IT staffer for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) who has been under criminal investigation was arrested when he tried to leave the country from Washington, D.C.’s Dulles International Airport, according to reports.

Imran Awan, 37, of Virginia, pleaded not guilty to one count of bank fraud after the arrest. Federal authorities said Awan allegedly tried to get a $165,000 home equity loan through the Congressional Federal Credit Union for a rental property, which violates the credit union’s policy because it is not the owner’s primary residence, reported Politico.

The $165,000 was then transferred to two people in Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Awan was on his way to Pakistan, where his wife, Hina Alvi, and children are currently residing, before he was arrested. Federal agents said they didn’t believe Awan had any intention of returning to the U.S.

He will have to wear a GPS-monitoring device, abide by a curfew and surrender his passports before his next court date in August.

Awan’s attorney, Chris Gowen, said his client is the victim of a right-wing media conspiracy.

“This is clearly a right-wing media-driven prosecution by a United States Attorney’s Office that wants to prosecute people for working while Muslim,” Gowen said. “A quick glance at what the government filed in court today confirms the lack of evidence or proof they have against my client.”

Awan is a longtime Democratic House staffer who was worked for more than 24 Democrats, including Wasserman Schultz, since 2004.

According to a February Politico report, Awan and several other staffers, including his wife, were under investigation for equipment and data theft from Democratic House members. Alvi was fired in March and moved to Pakistan, but Awan was kept on Wasserman Schultz’s staff until his arrest Tuesday.

“Mr. Awan previously served as a part-time employee but his services have been terminated,” said Wasserman Schultz spokesman David Damron. “No charges, evidence or findings from the investigation have been formally shared with our office, so we cannot comment on them.”

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-07-27.

Fonte: qui

The Mother of All Bubbles


We live in a world full of bubbles just waiting to pop.
We have reported extensively on the stock market bubble, the student loan bubble, and the auto bubble. We even told you about a shoe bubble. But there is one bubble that is bigger and potentially more threatening than any of these.
The massive debt bubble.
In a recent piece published by Business Insider, US Global Investors CEO Frank Holmes calls it “the mother of all bubbles.”
According to the Institute of International Finance (IIF), global debt levels reached a staggering $217 trillion in the first quarter of 2017. That represents 327%  of global GDP. To put that into perspective, before the 2008 meltdown, global debt was a mere $150 trillion.
American families have amassed more than $1 trillion in credit card debt alone. As of the end of 2016, the average credit card debt per American household stood at $8,377. That was up from $7,893 at the end of 2015.
Everyday Americans aren’t the only ones racking up debt. They are simply following the example of their Uncle Sam. The US national debt has eclipsed $20 trillion, with actual unfunded liabilities pushing far higher.
China is also piling up debt at a torrid pace. Moody’s projects the Chinese government’s debt burden will rise to near 40% of GDP by 2018 and 45% by the end of the decade.
Holmes says this does not bode well for our economic future.
It goes without saying that this is a huge risk. Some are calling this mountain of debt ‘the mother of all bubbles,’ and we all remember how the last two bubbles ended, in 2000 (the tech or dotcom bubble) and 2007 (the housing bubble).”
Scotiabank released a note recently and expressed concern about all of this debt in a world of rising interest rates.
Higher interest rates are going to make the burden of refinancing the debt considerably heavier, and as more money goes into servicing the debt, it means less money is available to spend on other things, which could lead to less infrastructure spending and increased austerity.”
How in the world to you pay down so much debt? Realistically, you don’t. At some point, the bubble will burst.
In the midst of bubble world, Holmes says investors should buy gold, and called the yellow metal’s long-term investment case “bright.” He said if and when the mother of all bubbles pops, it could potentially spell trouble for the investor who hasn’t adequately prepared with some allocation in a safe haven.
Another crisis could be in the works. Savvy investors and savers might very well see this as a sign to allocate a part of their portfolios in ‘safe haven’ assets that have historically held their value in times of economic contraction. Gold is one such asset that’s been a good store of value in such times.”

Fonte: qui

martedì 25 luglio 2017

The Elephant in the Room: Debt

“And you may ask yourself, well…how did I get here?”
Talking Heads—“Once in a Lifetime”
It’s the elephant in the room; the guest no one wants to talk to—debt! Total global debt is estimated to be about $217 trillion and some believe it could be as high as $230 trillion. In 2008, when the global financial system almost collapsed global debt stood at roughly $142 trillion. The growth since then has been astounding. Instead of the world de-leveraging, the world has instead leveraged up. While global debt has been growing at about 5% annually, global nominal GDP has been averaging only about 3% annually (all measured in US$). World debt to GDP is estimated at about 325% (that is all debt—governments, corporations, individuals). In some countries such as the United Kingdom, it exceeds 600%. It has taken upwards of $4 in new debt to purchase $1 of GDP since the 2008 financial crisis. Many have studied and reported on the massive growth of debt including McKinsey & Companywww.mickinsey.com, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) www.imf.org, and the World Bank www.worldbank.org.
So how did we get here? The 2008 financial crisis threatened to bring down the entire global financial structure. The authorities (central banks) responded in probably the only way they could. They effectively bailed out the system by lowering interest rates to zero (or lower), flooding the system with money, and bailing out the financial system (with taxpayers’ money).
It was during this period that saw the monetary base in the US and the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet explode from $800 billion to over $4 trillion in a matter of a few years. They flooded the system with money through a process known as quantitative easing (QE). All central banks especially the Fed, the BOJ and the ECB and the Treasuries of the respective countries did the same. It was the biggest bailout in history. As an example, the US national debt exploded from $10.4 trillion in 2008 to $19.9 trillion today. It wasn’t just the US though as the entire world went on a debt binge, thanks primarily to low interest rates that persist today. 
So what did it accomplish? Well, the western economies stumbled along through periods of low growth and continue that way today. As economist John Maudlinwww.maudlineconomics.com calls it, it is the “muddle through” economy. But if the US and the major western economies (the EU, North America, Japan, Australia) were heavy borrowers the real growth in debt occurred in developing economies such as China and in emerging economies.
In 1989, the US was 61% of the global bond market. By June 2016, the US was only 38% of the global bond market. Emerging markets went from 1% to 18% while developing economies surged from 38% to 45% with China leading the way. Today emerging economy debt along with debt such as China’s threatens the entire global financial structure.
US Monetary Base
http://goldseek.com/news/2017/7-21dc/image002.gif
Note how the monetary base is contracting. That usually is warning sign as funds are being withdrawn from the financial system.
With the surge in the amount of money “sloshing” through the financial system because of QE, abnormally low interest rates and the surge in debt, the funds found their way into the stock market and real estate, setting up the potential for financial bubbles. Global stock markets have surged since 2009 with a couple of shallow interruptions along the way in 2011 and 2015/2016. Witness since the lows of 2009 the S&P 500 is up 270%, the London FTSE is up 116%, the Paris CAC 40 is up 112%, the German DAX has gained 247%, the Chinese Shanghai Index (SSEC) has jumped 94% but was up 211% at its peak in 2015, while the Tokyo Nikkei Dow (TKN) has gained 186%.
Canada’s TSX Composite has been a bit of a laggard gaining only 104% as it is constrained by its heavy exposure to energy and materials two areas that have not done particularly well since 2009. The TSX Energy Index is actually down 6% from the lows of 2009 while the TSX Materials Index is up 46%.
Real estate prices have surged since 2009 not just here in Canada but generally around the world. Housing prices have surged anywhere from 70% to well over 100% here in Canada since 2009 depending on what type of housing it is and location and city. Toronto and Vancouver have experienced the biggest surge in prices. But prices have surged in the US as well even though in many respects they remain below the peaks of 2006. In Europe, Asia and elsewhere real estate has surged all fueled by low interest rates and abundant money available for mortgages.
Are the bubbles over yet? Probably not, as bubbles have a tendency to rise further than the bears expect. While the gains have been impressive, the stock market for example remains well below previous bubble market gains.
But trouble is on the horizon even if it has not hit home just yet. Interest rates are rising but are not yet at a point where they could cause a crash. Watch the spreads between 2-year and 10-year government debt. Currently, they are positive but if they turn negative it is usually a bad sign. Delinquencies are rising, particularly on commercial and industrial loans but also on consumer loans in North America and the EU. In China, the $2 trillion mortgage market is teetering and many believe it looks like the US sub-prime market in 2006/2007.
Chinese banks are reporting a sharp rise in delinquencies and bad loans. Pension funds that are already globally underfunded hold a considerable amount of debt of not only countries but also corporations. Consumer debt and others have been bundled and securitized much as sub-prime mortgages were before the financial collapse of 2008. Rising delinquency rates could eventually have a negative impact on them and a whole host of loans. Banks are tightening their lending criteria as they become nervous. Financial panics and depressions are usually debt collapse panics. They always say that “this time it’s different.” The only thing that is usually different is the ultimate cause and trigger.
The Bank of England (BOE) recently issued a report expressing concern about systemic risk in global markets. The report centered on a concern for the huge exposure of non-bank lenders and huge amounts of corporate loans outstanding. There was concern that markets could become disorderly if there were large redemptions and how that could negatively affect mutual funds and hedge funds. Runs on funds are not unusual. The BOE expressed concern about a pullback in QE from the ECB and the shaky Italian banking system (they should have noted Spain and Greece too). As well, they noted the propensity for corporations to “dress up” their balance sheets, a problem that was prevalent before the 2000–2002 Dot Com collapse. Central banks may issue warnings (here in Canada the BofC has as well) but does anyone heed them?
Delinquency rate on commercial and industrial loans, all commercial banks - US
http://goldseek.com/news/2017/7-21dc/image004.gif
Rising, but not yet a problem.


A significant risk that is no doubt being overlooked is ongoing geopolitical confrontation. Geopolitical risk is real and rising. A recent Pentagon study concludes the US-backed international order that was established after WW2 is “fraying” and may even be “collapsing.” What it is saying is US power is in decline and in that respect the international order is unravelling. The main power confrontations come from China and Russia both of who are showing “resistance to authority,” meaning US authority. US global hegemony is under stress led by China and Russia, as they both want to get out from under US control with their creation of the “New Silk Road,” the creation of their own IMF, World Bank, and SWIFT system for international payments. The Asian continent, the Mid-East and Africa and parts of Europe would join as they have all chafed under US hegemony. The IMF, the World Bank, SWIFT, and even global trade are currently US-dominated with the US often deciding who gets what or if they don’t play by their rules they kick them out as has happened with the global SWIFT system. As well, there would be a major shift away from the US$ as the global reserve currency. Already much of Asia and others are conducting business in Chinese Yuan. In turn, both China and Russia have been building up their gold reserves to back their currencies with tangible assets.
The study acknowledges the role the US plays globally as a political, military, and economic giant, but the US no longer in an unassailable position. It faces competition from China and Russia, with threats from smaller players such as Iran and North Korea. Not only is the order “fraying,” but it may be collapsing. Pentagon studies have not only focused on geopolitical risks but also on the environmental risks of rising sea levels and “frayed” weather due to “global warming.” The solution, according to the Pentagon, is to strengthen the US through its military, its surveillance, and more propaganda (or as they call it, “strategic manipulation of perceptions”).
The Pentagon study also noted rising destabilization due to civil unrest, not only in places such as the Mid-East but domestically as well—in the US, the EU, and elsewhere (for example, Venezuela) where civil clashes have become almost a daily event and under-reported. There was also concern about leaks as exemplified by Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning and how that could trigger more civil unrest.
We live in an increasingly dangerous world. Another collapse and it won’t be the central banks riding to the rescue. Instead, holders of bank debt and depositors will be on the hook through a process known as bail-ins, not bailouts. Debt may be the elephant in the room, but growing geopolitical unrest could in the end be the trigger for a debt meltdown. So, “you may ask yourself, how did I get here?”                  

Fonte: qui

P.S. se volete utilizzare il servizio di traduzione automatica, selezionate dalla funzione

Translate


una lingua qualunque, poi sempre da lì quella in italiano.